High-Yield Corporate Bonds as an Asset Class

Vanguard recently announced that it would be closing its high-yield corporate fund “effective immediately” and that the fund had received “approximately $2 billion” of flows over the past six months. While growth of Vanguard’s assets under management is almost always a good thing, a fund shuttering its doors to new flows makes one wonder just how frothy credit markets have become.

Let’s take a step back, though, and look at high-yield bonds as an asset class. Many investors simply don’t understand the returns that high-yield bonds have historically generated or just how closely correlated they are with the equity markets.

Over the period 1970–2009, Moody’s reports that 21 percent of high-yield corporate bonds defaulted within a typical five-year period. This means that if you started with a portfolio of 100 high-yield corporate bonds, on average 21 of those would have defaulted after a five-year holding period. From the investor’s point of view, this means the return on investment would be substantially less than the yield of a portfolio of high-yield bonds.

We can gauge how much “slippage” there has been using data from Barclays Capital. Barclays reports that the yield advantage of high-yield corporate bonds compared with Treasury bonds of comparable maturity has been about 5.3 percent over the period January 1994–March 2012. This means that if Treasury bonds yielded 5 percent on average over this period then high-yield bonds yielded about 10.3 percent on average. Yet, the return advantage of high-yield corporate bonds relative to Treasury bonds has been about only 2 percent per year. So, investors lost roughly 60 percent of the yield advantage to defaults.

Further, we also see that high-yield bonds have been helped by outstanding recent performance relative to Treasuries. For the period 2009–2011, high-yield bonds outperformed comparable Treasuries by a whopping 18.5 percent per year, making up for the significant long-term underperformance of the previous 15 years, when they underperformed Treasuries by 1.9 percent per year.

From a correlation point of view, high-yield corporate bonds tend to be closely related to the stock market. This means that if you add high-yield corporate bonds to your fixed income portfolio and treat them like your other fixed income, you will likely be in for a big surprise when stock markets head south. As one example from January 2007–February 2009, which encompasses the worst part of the financial crisis and a terrible period for the stock market, high-yield corporate bonds underperformed Treasury bonds by about 40 percent. Over the third quarter of 2011, when the Eurozone crisis hit one of many boiling points, high-yield corporate bonds underperformed Treasury bonds by about 10 percent.

Another basic question: Is it possible to create a portfolio that performs similarly or better than high-yield corporate bonds using stocks and Treasury bonds? Such a portfolio would be more tax efficient than high-yield corporate bonds because a large portion of its return would be in the form of capital gains, and it’s also worth noting that Treasury bonds are not currently taxable at the state level while high-yield corporate bonds generally are. Using the January 1994–March 2012 period from above, a portfolio with about 40 percent in small-value stocks and 60 percent in high-quality fixed income would have performed very similarly to high-yield bonds, underperforming by about 1 percent per year. That underperformance, however, likely would have been offset by the relative tax efficiencies of the stock and Treasury portfolio compared with the high-yield corporate bond portfolio.

In summary, we find that a substantial fraction of high-yield corporate bonds ultimately default. Consequently, the returns of high-yield corporate bonds compared with Treasury bonds have been substantially less than the yield advantage. Further, a portfolio of stocks and bonds — particularly on an after-tax basis — should do a decent job of tracking the returns of high-yield corporate bonds over the longer term.

By clicking on any of the links above, you acknowledge that they are solely for your convenience, and do not necessarily imply any affiliations, sponsorships, endorsements or representations whatsoever by us regarding third-party Web sites. We are not responsible for the content, availability or privacy policies of these sites, and shall not be responsible or liable for any information, opinions, advice, products or services available on or through them.

The opinions expressed by featured authors are their own and may not accurately reflect those of the BAM ALLIANCE. This article is for general information only and is not intended to serve as specific financial, accounting or tax advice.

© 2013, The BAM ALLIANCE

Share Button

Buckingham Strategic Wealth

Buckingham Strategic Wealth was founded in 1994 to provide a disciplined, academically based investment experience tailored to address each client’s distinct willingness, ability and need to accept market risk. Offering an advisor relationship built on personal trust and company-wide integrity, we serve as a Registered Investment Advisor offering fee-based investment management to individuals, businesses, trusts, partnerships, not-for-profit organizations and retirement plans.

Foundational Materials

Buckingham prides itself on producing a wealth of non-biased financial information on a regular basis. See these articles from our blog and from our thought leaders around the nation.

Buckingham Library

Click on the covers to learn more and order the books our national thought leaders have written in recent years.

Previous Slide
Next Slide